Skip to main content
City of Albuquerque
File #: EC-24-253   
Type: Executive Communication Status: Sustained
File created: 10/21/2024 In control: President
Final action: 10/21/2024
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Veto Of R-24-85 - Amending Section 2-1-7 Of The City Of Albuquerque Code Of Resolutions Related To The Charter Review Task Force (Champine)
Attachments: 1. EC-253
Date Action ByActionResultAction Details
10/21/2024 City Council Received (Immediate Action Pursuant to City Charter)  Action details
10/21/2024 President Immediate Action Pursuant to City Charter  Action details
10/21/2024 City Council SustainedPass Action details


TIMOTHY M. KELLER, MAYOR

CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR/ CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE


INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
TIMOTHY M. KELLER, MAYOR
SUBJECT:
Veto Of R-24-85 - Amending Section 2-1-7 Of The City Of Albuquerque Code Of Resolutions Related To The Charter Review Task Force (Champine)

DATE:
OCTOBER 17, 2024


TITLE
Veto Of R-24-85 - Amending Section 2-1-7 Of The City Of Albuquerque Code Of Resolutions Related To The Charter Review Task Force (Champine)
BODY
I support the idea of establishing a 10-year reoccurring Charter Review Task Force, and could support a resolution that offers a more equitable process that is in step with past efforts and our current Charter. I write today in the hopes that we might be able to revisit this ordinance together, to craft a structure that best balances both geographic representation and the explicit interests - as enumerated in the current Charter and previous Charter Reviews - of both the legislative and executive branches of Albuquerque government. To enable us to work on a mutually agreed upon proposal, I am vetoing R-24-85, the legislation that sets up a charter review task force, because it doesn't maintain an appropriate balance between the geographic representation or legislative and executive branch obligations outlined under the current City Charter.
Albuquerque has been through this process before, in 2008 and 2015. Both times we saw a much more balanced approach: In 2008 there were ten members appointed by the City Council and four by the Mayor; and in 2015 there were eleven members appointed by the City Council and four by the Mayor. But R-24-85 drastically changes that balance, with ten Council appointees and just one from the Mayor's side. That's not enough to ensure city wide and executive branch perspectives. Without more equal representation, there's a real risk that this task force could lean too heavily toward one side, damaging trust in its recommendations. That's why I ...

Click here for full text